Aleman-Gonzalez, the Supreme Court limited the availability of bond hearings for detained immigrants. Texas, other Supreme Court decisions this past term are likely to have negative implications for immigrant communities. The Court’s decision represented a positive outcome for migrants, many of whom faced an increased risk of kidnapping and violence in Mexico. In that case, the Supreme Court reversed lower court rulings to hold that the Biden administration could terminate MPP, which required many asylum-seekers to wait in Mexico for the duration of their immigration proceedings. Texas, centering on the Trump-era Migrant Protection Protocols (“MPP”) (also known as “Remain in Mexico”), ended with a mostly favorable outcome for immigrant communities. The justices have also heard disputes over the fate of $400 billion in student loan forgiveness, religious exemptions from civil rights law, the definition of the Waters of the United States under the Clean Water Act and the Biden administration’s ability to use guidance on immigration decisions.During the 2021-2022 term, the Supreme Court considered a number of cases that significantly impacted immigration law and policy. The court heard some of its most consequential cases of the term in those first two months, including disputes over the reach of the Voting Rights Act and constitutionality of affirmative action in higher education. The report was not able to rule out a breach of the Supreme Court’s systems or that the draft was leaked accidentally by being left in a public place. That report also found numerous shortcomings in the court’s document handling and information security that prevented staff from identifying the leaker. Curley released in January said staff had not been able to identify the leaker. A report from the Marshal of the Supreme Court Gail A. This is also the first time the court has handled writing and distributing opinions since the leak of a draft majority opinion last term. Justices might also end up forgoing concurring opinions “that don’t necessarily need to be written, just because of the volume of work that they’re obviously going to need to do to get all these opinions out in the next couple of months,” Gorod said. “When we finally see who all the dissenters were and how splintered the opinions may be, we'll have a better sense of whether this really was an unpleasant time for the court, or whether it was just a lot of separate opinions or something like that.”īrianne Gorod, chief counsel for the Constitutional Accountability Center, said that the delay in releasing decisions may wind up with the justices curtailing the length of opinions. “It's kind of hard to tell what's going on,” Elwood said. The more justices write about a case, the longer it will take to release the opinion. One potential factor could be cases where justices want to write separately in the decision, Elwood said. John Elwood, a partner at Arnold & Porter and the head of the firm’s appellate and Supreme Court practice, said he has never seen this many opinions outstanding this far into a term. So I don't think anyone needs to worry,” Kavanaugh told the crowd at the Notre Dame Law Review Federal Courts Symposium. "I am confident they'll all be out by the end of June. Kavanaugh defended the court’s slow pace in an appearance at a Notre Dame event in January, attributing it to “a coincidence of which mix of cases were in October and November.” By this time last term, the court had issued nearly two dozen opinions. Experts say the court has handled cases at a historically slow pace this term, with just 13 issued. They kept a commonly used medication abortion drug on the market, and rebuffed former President Donald Trump’s effort to intervene in the Justice Department’s investigation that found classified documents at his private club.īut the last oral arguments of the term were last week, and there are still opinions in potential blockbuster cases that will be released before the conclusion of the term at the end of June.Īnd it could be a time crunch. The justices already have weighed in on high-profile issues since the beginning of the term in October. The Supreme Court has dozens of cases to decide in the next two months that could reshape American law on race in elections and education, religious protections in the workplace and other areas.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |